Committed to Maximizing Value for 79 Arcadia Ave.

Seamless, Transparent, and Profitable Sale – With over 13 years of experience, I provide expert guidance every step of the way, ensuring top dollar, full transparency, and a smooth, stress-free transition.

Meet Alex 

Expert Guidance for Property Sales in Cranston.

Selling a property requires local expertise and a strategic approach. With extensive experience in the Cranston market, I provide tailored solutions to ensure a smooth and successful transaction. My approach includes targeted marketing, professional photography, and a results-driven strategy designed to maximize the property’s value. By navigating the complexities of property sales with professionalism and efficiency, I help investors achieve the best possible outcome while ensuring compliance with legal and market requirements.

Learn More About My Credentials
alexander-parmenidez-realtor-alex-parmenidez-CMA-providence-ri-real-estate-agents

Streamlined Sales for Efficiency and Solvency

Clear & Transparent Process

  • Stay informed with regular updates and a shared document for smooth coordination.

Smart Strategy & Pricing

  • A customized plan ensures fairness, efficiency, and data-driven pricing to maximize value.

Safe, Fast & Even Enjoyable

  • With a structured, compassionate approach, I make the process secure, seamless, and as stress-free as possible.

Why Alex Parmenidez is the Right Choice
needed-advice

Your Property Market Analysis & Comparable Listings

See how your property compares to similar homes on the market and gain insights into selling for top dollar

79 Arcadia Ave, Cranston, RI 02905
Access Your Market Analysis

79 Arcadia Ave, Cranston, RI 02905

Supporting Your Needs Every Step of the Way

01

Initial Consultation

Together, we’ll discuss your goals and concerns.

03

Listing Preparation

From staging to professional photography, I handle it all.

02

Home Valuation & CMA

I’ll provide a clear, data-driven property valuation.

04

Market & Show

I’ll manage showings with discretion, ensuring respect for both parties’ schedules

06

Closing

Clear expectations, final documentation, and support until the last step.

05

Offer Review & Negotiation

Both parties will review offers, and I’ll offer unbiased guidance to secure the best possible terms.

The Success Blueprint

DOCUMENTS
LISTING DOCUMENTS

DOCUMENTS

PROPERTY
YOUR DATA

PROPERTY

SUCCESS
PROVEN. POWERFUL. PERSONAL

SUCCESS

CONFIDENCE
LIST YOUR HOME WITH CONFIDENCE

CONFIDENCE

Single Family — Market Analysis & Valuation
79 Arcadia Avenue — Cranston, Rhode Island
Style: Cape CodBeds: 3  |  Baths Full: 1Above Grade Living: 1,071 SFBelow Grade: 400 SFLot: 3,995 SFRooms: 66 Comparable Sales Analyzed
Subject Property — Key Metrics
Abv Gr Living SF
1,071
Below Grade SF
400
Lot Square Ft
3,995
Beds / Baths Full
3 / 1
Rooms
6
Style
Cape Cod
City
Cranston
Year Built
Not available in CSV
Comparable Sales — Cranston  |  Status: SS  |  Property Type: SFM
#AddressMLS #Abv Gr LivSFSold PricePrice / SqFtDOMLot SqFtYr BuiltBedsBaths Full
C112 Gail Avenue1388768911$368,000$403.95833,049192921
C273 Arcadia Avenue13974121,170$440,000$376.07264,250199132
C368 Cliffdale Avenue13995781,277$430,000$336.73277,841192031
C485 Alton Street1400042936$485,000$518.1676,098197932
C528 Sylvan Avenue14003841,274$390,000$306.121033,049192031
C642 Netherlands Avenue14007831,256$389,500$310.11774,356193432
Note: "Sold Price" is sourced from the "Current Price" column in the CSV, confirmed via Closed Date cross-reference. "Baths Full" is used — no "Baths Total" column exists in the CSV. $/SqFt values are independently calculated; the CSV's own Price/SqFt column was not used.
Price-Per-SqFt Summary
Lowest $/SqFt
$306.12
28 Sylvan Ave (C5)
Highest $/SqFt
$518.16
85 Alton St (C4)
Simple Average
$375.19
2,251.14 ÷ 6
Weighted Average
$366.72
2,502,500 ÷ 6,824
Median $/SqFt
$356.40
(336.73 + 376.07) ÷ 2
Calculation Detail —  Sum $/SF: 403.95 + 376.07 + 336.73 + 518.16 + 306.12 + 310.11 = 2,251.14  |  Avg: 2,251.14 ÷ 6 = 375.19
Total Sold: 368,000 + 440,000 + 430,000 + 485,000 + 390,000 + 389,500 = 2,502,500  |  Total SF: 911 + 1,170 + 1,277 + 936 + 1,274 + 1,256 = 6,824
Wtd Avg: 2,502,500 ÷ 6,824 = 366.72  |  Sorted: 306.12 | 310.11 | 336.73 | 376.07 | 403.95 | 518.16 → Median: (336.73 + 376.07) ÷ 2 = 356.40
Valuation — Subject: 1,071 SF (Apx Abv Gr LivSF)
ASimple Average
1,071 × $375.19  →  (1,071 × 375) + (1,071 × 0.19) = 401,625 + 203.49
$401,828
BWeighted Average
1,071 × $366.72  →  (1,071 × 366) + (1,071 × 0.72) = 391,986 + 771.12
$392,757
CMedian
1,071 × $356.40  →  (1,071 × 356) + (1,071 × 0.40) = 381,276 + 428.40
$381,704
DFinal Range
Tightest band: Methods A & B
Method A ($401,828) and Method B ($392,757) form the tightest price band — range spans B → A
$392,757 – $401,828
Data-Driven Market Analysis
Subject Size Ranking: At 1,071 SF, the subject ranks 3rd smallest among all six comparables. Sorted by above-grade living area: 911 · 936 · 1,071 ▶ · 1,170 · 1,256 · 1,274 · 1,277. The subject sits above only C1 and C4 and below the four largest comparable sales.
Subject vs. Comparable Average Size: The average above-grade living area across all six comparables is 1,137 SF (6,824 ÷ 6 = 1,137.33 SF). The subject at 1,071 SF is 66 SF below the comparable average — a 5.8% size deficit that supports positioning toward the lower bound of the final valuation range under square-footage-driven methods.
$/SqFt Trend by Size: The data shows a clear inverse relationship between above-grade square footage and price per square foot. The two smallest comparables — C1 at 911 SF / $403.95/SF and C4 at 936 SF / $518.16/SF — achieved the highest rates. The four largest comparables (1,170–1,277 SF) ranged from $306.12 to $376.07/SF. The subject at 1,071 SF occupies the transition zone between these groups, consistent with the final range of $392,757 – $401,828.
Days on Market Patterns: DOM spans from a low of 7 days (C4 — 85 Alton Street, $518.16/SF) to a high of 103 days (C5 — 28 Sylvan Avenue, $306.12/SF), with a group average of 53.8 days (323 ÷ 6). The two fastest-selling properties (C4: 7 days; C2: 26 days; C3: 27 days) also represent some of the stronger $/SF outcomes. The two longest-market properties (C5: 103 days; C1: 83 days) correspond to the lowest and a mid-tier $/SF, suggesting extended time on market correlates with lower realized pricing in this dataset.
Lot Size & Year Built Observations: The subject's lot of 3,995 SF falls in the lower half of the comparable lot range (3,049 – 7,841 SF). Notably, the largest lot in the set — C3 at 7,841 SF — achieved one of the lower $/SF rates ($336.73), indicating lot size is not the dominant pricing variable in this dataset. Year built for the subject is not available in the CSV. Among comparables, vintage ranges from 1920 to 1991; no consistent linear relationship between year built and $/SF is evident across the six sales, with mid-century and early-20th-century homes varying widely from $306.12 to $518.16/SF.
All data, calculations, and insights are derived exclusively from the attached CSV with no external information, assumptions, or inferred values.